Man About Town is Mark Merlis's third novel, and the follow-up to the Lammie winner "An Arrow's Flight" (in my library, still unread).
I much enjoyed Merlis's first novel, "American Studies," and have looked forward to the trade paperback release of "Man About Town." (One of the many quirks to my character is that I prefer trade paperback to all other book editions. Don't ask why - I don't know).
"Man About Town" is plagued by a vaguely unlikeable narrator. This is frankly a daring choice. I'm not sure how easy it is to read a first-person narrative with a narrator who is plagued by so many neuroses and insecurities.
For me, this served as much of a cautionary tale - especially with respect to the prospect of being middle-aged and single in a gay world where middle-aged men are largely invisible.
Troubling to me were the continual references to how Joel, the narrator, had "let himself go" - implying that he was grossly overweight. What constitued grossly overweight? His waist size was 35. If/when I'm in a 35, it will be a day for rejoicing. This book, despite exploring issues of older gay men on the outskirts of the gym/AF culture, still, in my humble opinion, promotes the extreme lookism that permeates modern gay life.
This is an interesting irony in a book that idolizes the 50s/60s gay ideal that was much less gym-crazed (ie, men with natural beauty/bodies versus gym-crafted six packs). Even though it harkens back nostalgically to that time, the emphasis with how fat, lazy, and slobbish Joel is (with his size 35 waist) is insulting.
Why couldn't Joel have a 35 inch waist and be invisible and a good person? Who took pride in his appearance? He was a complete mess, as evidenced by his fatness/slopiness. He would have been just as invisible had he been well put together and fat. The latent racism was also alarming. Joel was a very dislikeable character, despite how much I might have understood/empathized with his situation.
The execution of the novel was expert, but sometimes I wonder about the plot choices that were made. In this case, I would give 2 stars to the plot/subject choices, and 3 stars for artistic merit.